Appreciation and Recognition  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Appreciation and Recognition
3.26
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
white
N/A
Recognition: For teaching
3.36
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
white
N/A
Recognition: For advising
3.05
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
 
 
white
 
N/A
Recognition: For scholarship
3.34
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
white
white
white
N/A
Recognition: For service
3.06
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
white
white
white
N/A
Recognition: For outreach
2.97
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
 
white
urm
N/A
Recognition: From colleagues
3.73
N/A
 
N/A
full
 
 
 
 
N/A
Recognition: From CAO
2.51
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
 
women
white
 
white
N/A
Recognition: From Dean
3.20
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
assoc
men
 
 
white
N/A
Recognition: From Head/Chair
3.82
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
School/college is valued by Pres/Provost
3.23
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
 
 
white
 
white
N/A
Dept. is valued by Pres/Provost
2.98
N<5
N/A
N<5
N/A
 
 
white
 
white
N/A
CAO cares about faculty of my rank
2.78
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
 
N/A
 
Last Updated Oct 23, 2020