Departmental Engagement, Quality, and Collegiality › Demographic Analysis
* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
|
Your results compared to PEERS ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ► |
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED |
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
mean |
overall |
tenured |
pre-ten |
ntt |
full |
assoc |
men |
women |
white |
foc |
asian |
urm |
ten vs pre-ten |
ten vs ntt |
full vs assoc |
men vs women |
white vs foc |
white vs asian |
white vs urm |
change over time |
|||||||
Departmental Collegiality |
3.93
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Colleagues support work/life balance |
3.78
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Meeting times compatible with personal needs |
4.11
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/Pre-tenure |
3.80
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
How well you fit |
3.94
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/Tenured |
3.70
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Colleagues pitch in when needed |
3.83
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Department is collegial |
4.07
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Colleagues committed to diversity/inclusion |
4.20
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Departmental Engagement |
3.67
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Discussions of undergrad student learning |
3.92
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
women
|
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Discussions of grad student learning |
3.70
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
N/A
|
||||||
Discussions of effective teaching practices |
3.82
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
men
|
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Discussions of effective use of technology |
3.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
full
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
urm
|
N/A
|
||||||
Discussions of current research methods |
3.20
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
men
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/Pre-tenure |
3.90
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/Tenured |
3.78
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Departmental Quality |
3.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
white
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of tenured faculty |
3.65
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of pre-tenure faculty |
4.14
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenured
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of tenured faculty |
3.44
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
men
|
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of pre-tenure faculty |
3.95
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
foc
|
asian
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of tenured faculty |
3.79
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of pre-tenure faculty |
4.06
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
|
asian
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Dept. is successful at faculty recruitment |
3.98
|
|
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
men
|
|
asian
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Dept. is successful at faculty retention |
3.73
|
|
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N<5
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
men
|
|
asian
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Dept. addresses sub-standard performance |
2.80
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
women
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Related Survey Items |
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Intellectual vitality of NTT faculty |
3.61
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Scholarly productivity of NTT faculty |
3.29
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
white
|
white
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Teaching effectiveness of NTT faculty |
3.77
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
white
|
white
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of professional interaction w/NTT |
3.66
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
assoc
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
||||||
Amount of personal interaction w/NTT |
3.57
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-ten
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
white
|
N/A
|
||||||
Recruiting part-time faculty |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
Managing part-time faculty |
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||
