Shared Governance  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Governance: Trust
3.06
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
 
white
N/A
I understand how to voice opinions about policies
3.05
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
 
 
 
 
N/A
Clear rules about the roles of faculty and administration
3.13
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
 
white
N/A
Faculty and admin follow rules of engagement
3.13
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
Faculty and admin have an open system of communication
3.00
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin discuss difficult issues in good faith
3.14
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
Governance: Shared Sense of Purpose
2.99
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
 
N/A
Important decisions are not made until there is consensus
2.54
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
Admin ensures sufficient time for faculty input
2.87
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin respectfully consider the other's view
3.08
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin have a shared sense of responsibility
3.38
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
 
asian
 
N/A
Governance: Understanding the Issue at Hand
3.03
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty governance structures offer opportunities for input
3.19
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
 
 
white
N/A
Admin communicate rationale for important decisions
2.92
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin have equal say in decisions
2.63
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty and admin define decision criteria together
2.98
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Governance: Adaptability
2.98
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
white
white
white
N/A
Shared governance holds up in unusual circumstances
2.97
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
men
white
white
white
N/A
Institution regularly reviews effectiveness of governance
2.72
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
white
white
white
N/A
Institution cultivates new faculty leaders
3.18
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
 
white
N/A
Governance: Productivity
3.23
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
 
N/A
Overall effectiveness of shared governance
3.25
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
white
white
white
N/A
My committees make measureable progress towards goals
3.41
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
 
 
urm
N/A
Public recognition of progress
2.98
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
 
Last Updated Oct 23, 2020