Institutional Leadership  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Leadership: Senior
2.92
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
Pres/Chancellor: Pace of decision making
2.84
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
Pres/Chancellor: Stated priorities
2.97
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
 
 
white
N/A
Pres/Chancellor: Communication of priorities
2.82
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
CAO: Pace of decision making
2.93
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
CAO: Stated priorities
2.96
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
white
N/A
CAO: Communication of priorities
2.84
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
CAO: Ensuring faculty input
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Leadership: Divisional
3.71
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
 
 
 
N/A
Dean: Pace of decision making
3.71
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
white
 
white
N/A
Dean: Stated priorities
3.71
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
 
 
 
N/A
Dean: Communication of priorities
3.73
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
 
 
 
N/A
Dean: Ensuring faculty input
3.68
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
white
white
 
N/A
Leadership: Departmental
3.82
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
Head/Chair: Pace of decision making
3.72
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
women
white
 
white
N/A
Head/Chair: Stated priorities
3.71
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
Head/Chair: Communication of priorities
3.74
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
Head/Chair: Ensuring faculty input
3.87
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
 
white
N/A
Head/Chair: Fairness in evaluating work
4.05
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
asian
white
N/A
Leadership: Faculty
3.41
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty leaders: Pace of decision making
3.31
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty leaders: Stated priorities
3.44
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
 
 
 
N/A
Faculty leaders: Communication of priorities
3.43
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Faculty leaders: Ensuring faculty input
3.48
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
 
 
white
N/A
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Priorities are stated consistently
2.74
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
white
white
white
N/A
Priorities are acted on consistently
2.63
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
men
white
white
white
N/A
Changed priorities negatively affect my work
2.88
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
 
white
white
white
N/A
CAO: Support in adapting to change
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Visible leadership for support of diversity
4.16
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
 
Last Updated Oct 23, 2020