Nature of Work  ›  Demographic Analysis

* For help understanding this visualization, see "Guide" tab.
* To see the full name of column header, hover pointer over short name in external comparison column header.
 
 
Your results compared to PEERS   ◄
Your results compared to COHORT ►
Areas of strength in GREEN
Areas of concern in RED
Within campus differences
sm (.1)med. (.3)lrg. (.5)
 
mean
overall
tenured
pre-ten
ntt
full
assoc
men
women
white
foc
asian
urm
ten vs pre-ten
ten vs ntt
full vs assoc
men vs women
white vs foc
white vs asian
white vs urm
change over time
Nature of Work: Research
3.10
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
 
N/A
Time spent on research
3.02
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
women
 
white
 
N/A
Expectations for finding external funding
3.10
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
white
N/A
Influence over focus of research
4.10
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
women
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Quality of grad students to support research
2.78
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
 
foc
 
urm
N/A
Support for research
2.89
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
 
 
 
N/A
Support for engaging undergrads in research
2.92
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
women
 
 
white
N/A
Support for obtaining grants (pre-award)
2.99
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
 
white
 
N/A
Support for maintaining grants (post-award)
3.12
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
 
 
 
N/A
Support for securing grad student assistance
2.59
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
 
 
 
N/A
Support for travel to present/conduct research
3.20
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
 
white
 
N/A
Availability of course release for research
2.87
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
 
white
 
N/A
Nature of Work: Service
3.33
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
 
white
 
N/A
Time spent on service
3.39
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
 
 
 
 
N/A
Support for faculty in leadership roles
2.88
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
 
white
 
N/A
Number of committees
3.45
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
 
white
white
 
N/A
Attractiveness of committees
3.51
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
men
 
white
urm
N/A
Discretion to choose committees
3.54
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
 
 
 
N/A
Equitability of committee assignments
3.14
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
white
white
 
N/A
Number of student advisees
3.50
N/A
 
N/A
 
women
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Support for being a good advisor
2.93
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
white
white
 
N/A
Equity of the distribution of advising responsibilities
3.02
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
 
white
 
N/A
Nature of Work: Teaching
3.66
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Time spent on teaching
3.86
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Number of courses taught
3.40
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Level of courses taught
4.01
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
foc
asian
urm
N/A
Discretion over course content
4.34
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
 
foc
asian
 
N/A
Number of students in classes taught
3.54
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
 
women
 
asian
 
N/A
Quality of students taught
3.42
N/A
 
N/A
full
men
 
 
white
N/A
Equitability of distribution of teaching load
3.36
N/A
tenured
N/A
 
women
 
 
urm
N/A
Quality of grad students to support teaching
2.98
N/A
 
N/A
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
Teaching schedule
4.00
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
assoc
 
 
 
 
N/A
Support for teaching diverse learning styles
3.79
N/A
 
N/A
full
men
 
white
 
N/A
Support for assessing student learning
3.73
N/A
tenured
N/A
full
men
white
white
white
N/A
Support for developing online/hybrid courses
3.63
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
men
 
 
urm
N/A
Support for teaching online/hybrid courses
3.75
N/A
pre-ten
N/A
full
men
foc
 
urm
N/A
Related Survey Items
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Time spent on outreach
3.34
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
 
foc
 
urm
N/A
Time spent on administrative tasks
2.85
N/A
tenured
N/A
assoc
women
white
white
 
N/A
Ability to balance teaching/research/service
2.95
N/A
 
N/A
assoc
women
 
white
 
N/A
 
Last Updated Oct 23, 2020